[sane-standard] More device properties

[Étienne Bersac]

Hi,

> Well, I also contributed to the mess in the option names.

That's normal. The lake of spec leads to the mess.

> My point is that we should _actively maintain_ the "well-known
> options", and we may need some more or less formal procedure for it,
> like: Proposals for changes/extensions of the well options should be
> announced on the sane-devel mailing list, and should be committed at
> the earliest two weeks later.

That make sense.

> Right. Actually, that should be two files: a C header files with
> #defines for the options, and a text file (ot Tex file) that
> describes them.

I fully agree. 200% ! That will be so nice !

Does everyone agree with that ?

Étienne.
-- 
Verso l'Alto !
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-standard/attachments/20070118/bf438eb0/attachment.pgp