[Secure-testing-team] Updates for testing-security track page

Francesco Poli frx at firenze.linux.it
Wed Jun 21 23:22:32 UTC 2006


On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:38:14 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote:

> * Francesco Poli:
> 
> > Another possible misuse of this same kind of tag:
> >
> > * egroupware 1.2-1.dfsg-1 needed, have 1.0.0.009.dfsg-3-4 for
> > CVE-2006-2016
> 
> 1.2-1.dfsg-1 is in experimental only.  I think this one is correct in
> principle (especially if an upload of essentially that version
> unstable is expected), except that we usually do not track
> experimental.

I'm not sure I understand correctly.
Are you basically saying that the testing security holes page[1] is not
accurate anymore?

Joey, could you please clarify if your page generation script can take
into account the difference between "fixed in experimental" and "fixed
in unstable", despite showing identical lines?

[1] http://spohr.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html

-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20060622/808c78ca/attachment.pgp


More information about the Secure-testing-team mailing list