[DSE-Dev] Bug#660345: fixed in policycoreutils 2.1.10-5

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Laurent,


Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
> Le Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:57:08 +0100,
> Paul Menzel <pm.debian at googlemail.com> a écrit :

> > Am Dienstag, den 20.03.2012, 19:02 +0000 schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
> > 
> > I still get this error.
> > 
> >         $ LANG=C sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
> >         [sudo] password for paul: 
> >         Resolving dependencies...                
> >         The following partially installed packages will be configured:
> >           policycoreutils 
> >         No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> >         0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 12
> > not upgraded. Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will
> > be used. Setting up policycoreutils (2.1.10-5) ...
> >         Sandbox disabled, edit /etc/default/sandbox to enable it
> >         update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/policycoreutils exists during rc.d
> > purge (use -f to force) dpkg: error processing policycoreutils
> > (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned
> > error exit status 1 configured to not write apport reports
> >                                               Errors were encountered
> > while processing: policycoreutils
> >         E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> >         A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
> >         Setting up policycoreutils (2.1.10-5) ...
> >         Sandbox disabled, edit /etc/default/sandbox to enable it
> >         update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/policycoreutils exists during rc.d
> > purge (use -f to force) dpkg: error processing policycoreutils
> > (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned
> > error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing:
> >          policycoreutils
> 
> Was the package correctly configured before you've try to update it?
> I've the feeling when looking at the above output, that the old package
> was half-installed. But this definitely looks like the script from the
> old version of the package. I've just tried again and it's working for
> me.

It has been failing since I wrote the original report and was never
fully configured.


Thanks,

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/selinux-devel/attachments/20120322/50a19fff/attachment.pgp>