[Shootout-list] New benchmark?

[Isaac Gouy]

> Yeah, I'm not quite sure why the pidigits test is a "same way" test. 
> I can see forcing the overall algorithm to be the same, but I can't
> see why something like the implementation in the reference paper

So maybe what we're looking for is "same algorithm" (and sometimes
"same data-structure").

For example, pidigits - it's fine to use the step-by-step lazy-list
Haskell code in the reference paper. It isn't fine to use a different
algorithm.

(William, please don't reply to me as-well-as to the list.)


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com