[Shootout-list] Fasta in OCaml

[Isaac Gouy]

> OK... then shouldn't you show that the program resulted in an error, 
> rather than completing successfully with a full CPU time of 0.60
> seconds? 
> And perhaps it might be nice if the "correct" implementation 
> reflected a successful run rather than an error, as the Lua program
> currently does?
> 
> Hey... it might just be me, but I prefer to use a program that has 
> supposedly passed the test as a reference for my implementation
> rather than one that looks as if it has failed...

and

> After re-reading my reply, it occurs to me that it would have been
> more correct to ask that perhaps you rerun all of the tests and
> validate against a sample output file that is, you know, not
obselete.  
> I mean, is it too much to ask that the information presented on the
> website be kept consistent?

William, is it too much to ask that when you notice the "sample output
file doesn't jive with the benchmark program" you post that information
to the list, before you waste any of your valuable time?

Are you offering to spend your time keeping the website consistent?


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! 
http://my.yahoo.com