[ubuntu-dev] Bug#645958: Patch is wrong (sorry)
stefanor at debian.org
Thu Oct 20 12:52:44 UTC 2011
Hi Laurent (2011.10.20_08:18:34_+0200)
BTW, you don't have to use reportbug to reply to this bug, you can just
reply to the e-mail. As long as a copy goes to 645958 at bugs.debian.org,
it will be added to the bug page.
> I've forgot that we also can define a customized sources.list by using
> the TEMPLATE_SOURCES variable via the ~/.mk- (btw: not documented in
> the man).
Please feel free to provide patches for the manpages too :)
> for now, we can setup a customized sources.list in many ways:
> - via the ~/.mk-sbuild.rc file by using the TEMPLATE_SOURCES variable
> - via the ~/.mk-sbuild.sources
(which is just a default value for TEMPLATE_SOURCES)
> - via a specific distro based file, such as ~/.mk-sbuild.sources.debian
Not yet, but with your patch, yes.
> My question here is: In which order we must treat these possibilities when
> several of them are being used?
I'd say the same order as TEMPLATE_CHROOTCONF + types:
(and $TEMPLATE_SOURCES has a default value)
Even better, if we can find a way to use the _MIRROR variables (in
.devscripts / environment) that other ubuntu-dev-tools packages use.
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127
More information about the ubuntu-dev-team