a workflow based on rebasing? (was: RFC: DEP-3: Patch Tagging Guidelines)

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Guido Günther <agx at sigxcpu.org> [2009.07.22.1523 +0200]:
> Sure. I think I do understand what James is talking about. It's
> basically a matter of taste if you rebase patch branches or use
> topgit - both have their up and downsides.

With reference to
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/vcs-pkg-discuss/2009-May/000616.html,
I'd love to see a detailed account of your workflow. I am failing to
wrap my head around how it would work and would appreciate being
able to learn from you.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"the word yellow wandered through his mind in search of something to
 connect with."
                                 -- hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/vcs-pkg-discuss/attachments/20090722/1005ab28/attachment.pgp>