rethinking patch management with GIT / topgit
david at dgreaves.com
Sun Mar 28 08:24:16 UTC 2010
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I have heard people say that distributions should not carry
>> feature branches or long term fixes, but push it upstream; but in a
>> non ideal world some upstreams do not respond as quickly as one wants,
>> and secondly, a user obsession requires that users get desirable
>> features, even if upstream is tardy or does not see the light, and thus
>> feature branches might linger.
> That is _NOT_ distro's business. If you want such things, do a clean
> fork - w/ all implications. This creates a new/different package, out
> of the original package's versioning line. (eg. ff vs. iceweasel).
Can I just point out that this is your policy for your definition of a distro.
Others may feel differently.
"Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
More information about the vcs-pkg-discuss