[Yaird-devel] Re: initramfs generator selection
Frans Pop
aragorn at tiscali.nl
Thu Dec 29 15:48:09 UTC 2005
(Please do not CC me; I'm subscribed to all lists relevant here)
On Thursday 29 December 2005 16:34, Sven Luther wrote:
> I would have thought it the other way around, there is no reason to use
> initramfs-tools for a new install, since we are then not upgrading from
> 2.4 kernels.
That is not a reason _not_ to use it.
> The other issues are just bugs which needs to be fixed.
While they are there, IMO they make yaird the less obvious choice for D-I.
> But really, my own feeling is that initramfs-tools is still in a less
> mature state than yaird accross al architectures, not sure if this
> really changed for 2.6.15 though.
Can you give real arguments for that please?
Also, note that yaird _has_ been made the default for all architectures
where initramfs-tools is not installable or unusable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/yaird-devel/attachments/20051229/70be9709/attachment.pgp
More information about the Yaird-devel
mailing list