[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#859667: [Pkg-d-devel] Bug#859667: libundead: FTBFS on armhf and ppc64el: tests fail

[Iain Buclaw]

Which compiler?  Are NaNs being honoured? What if you were to replace
the `(x != x && f != f)` comparison with `(isNaN(x) && isNaN(f))` ?

On 5 April 2017 at 22:00, Andreas Tille <andreas at an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I admit I'm totally clueless and thus I'm asking D language team as well as
> porters for help.
>
> Thanks for any helpful hint
>
>       Andreas.
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:43:04PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>> Source: libundead
>> Version: 1.0.6-1
>> Severity: important
>> Justification: fails to build from source
>>
>> The libundead builds for armhf and ppc64 both failed with test suite
>> errors.  On armf, I see no specific indication of what went wrong, but
>> presume it should be possible to reproduce the problem on a porterbox.
>> On ppc64el, the log reports an assertion failure at
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/libundead.git/tree/src/undead/stream.d#n1458:
>>
>>   core.exception.AssertError at ../src/undead/stream.d(1458): Assertion failure
>>
>> Could you please take a look?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
>> http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
>> Debian-med-packaging at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
>>
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-d-devel mailing list
> Pkg-d-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-d-devel