[Debian-med-packaging] Bug#848497: We now have python3-biomaj3 - what about biomaj

Olivier Sallou olivier.sallou at irisa.fr
Wed Sep 27 07:55:52 UTC 2017



On 09/26/2017 02:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> it is worth migrating biomaj from SVN to Git and fix at least #803116
> which seems to come cheap.  Popcon-wise biomaj has 5 users versus one
> for python3-biomaj3 - but this might come from users of stable.
Hi,
python3-biomaj3 is recent and a rewrite of biomaj, and is in git. biomaj
(v1) is quite old will not have other releases, so not real need to
switch to git at this time as it will not change.


I uploaded in NEW the latest of biomaj3, which is splitted in multiple
components and git repos (so multiple packages, biomaj3,
biomaj3-download, etc.). But I forgot there was this intermediate
version which will conflit in a binary package. I consider to remove
this package that will be replaced by latest ones.

>
> Kind regards
>
>      Andreas.
>

-- 
Olivier Sallou
IRISA / University of Rennes 1
Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438



More information about the Debian-med-packaging mailing list