[pkg-apparmor] OPW Status Update, week 7 & 8

[Christian Boltz]

Hello,

Am Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2015 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> On Dienstag, 3. Februar 2015, u wrote:
> > * Found a small bug in aa-unconfined which has been patched by
> > upstream devs
> 
> afaik it's not fixed in trunk yet. I've also filed it as #777034 so
> it's documented properly, as it's very unlikely that we'll fix this
> for jessie.

It's fixed in upstream trunk and the 2.9 branch (commited some hours 
after Steve sent the ACK), so the next release will contain the fix.

Maybe we'll rewrite and merge some parts of aa-unconfined and aa-status 
(which have functionality overlaps), but that's something for the TODO 
list.

> > * Follow-up on new-profile tagged bugs: I have wanted to point the
> > new-profile bug submitters to our documentation. I got back one
> > email
> > from a package maintainer, who suggested that I should contact the
> > bug submitter directly and not use the BTS itself.
> 
> A common misconception about the BTS is, that mails to $nr at bugs.d.o
> also are send the submitter, which they arent. For that you
> explicitly mail ${nr}- submitter at bugs.d.o (and then maybe you want to
> cc: $nr at bugs.d.o also)

Oh, nice[tm] and good to know. Just curious - what's the reason of this 
(IMHO) strange behaviour?

The bugtrackers I typically use always mail the bug submitter on 
changes, except when he/she disabled those mails in the bugtracker 
settings. Having to explicitely CC the bugreporter is at least unusual.


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
> > My calendar shows May 12th to be a Friday, not a Thursday?
> I meant 11th ;-(.
With all the delays, perhaps mentioning the year would also be
a good idea. ;-)     [> Andreas Jaeger and houghi in opensuse]