[pkg-apparmor] OPW status update

[intrigeri]

Hi,

Holger Levsen wrote (21 Jan 2015 13:01:11 GMT) :
> On Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2015, u wrote:

>> * I am wondering about when "Suggests: apparmor" needs to have a version
>> number in debian/control.

> Afaik suggests are only ever parsed by humans...

The pedantic part of me would like versioned Suggests, but indeed it
would not be very helpful.

However, there are cases when included profiles can't be parsed with
older versions of apparmor_parser, and then if AppArmor is enabled,
the apparmor service will fail to start due to a parsing error.
I think the best way to make this breakage explicit would be:

  Breaks: apparmor (<< $REQUIRED_VERSION)

Thoughts?

>> * Follow-up on new-profile tagged bugs  I thought that it might be
>> useful to follow up on the latest bugs and point the person who
>> submitted the patches to the new documentation on how to contribute
>> upstream. What do you think?

> Sure! :) (surely useful to try to see what other people think about the 
> docs...!)

+1

Cheers,
-- 
intrigeri