[pkg-apparmor] Fwd: [apparmor] [RFC] test git tree for the apparmor-profiles repo

[Christian Boltz]

Hello,

Am Montag, 9. Mai 2016, 20:48:01 CEST schrieb intrigeri:
> Christian Boltz wrote (23 Feb 2016 19:58:38 GMT) :
> > Also, do we need any layout changes for the cross-distro profile
> > repo? If yes, _now_ would be a good time to do it - people have to
> > change to git, and doing another change on top (like a changed
> > directory structure) doesn't hurt. Al least it hurts less than
> > doing it in some months and breaking someone's workflow once more
> > ;-)
> 
> Sure. I'm sorry I still haven't taken time to send the notes of the
> discussion we had at DebConf :/

Actually implementing the profile repo would be more important ;-)

IIRC I already mentioned my profile collector package [1] that grabs all 
profiles in openSUSE and stores them in one RPM (which we can easily 
import into the repo as soon as it's available).

Can you estimate when you'll have some time to work on getting the repo
started?

IMHO it doesn't need to be 100% feature [2]-complete - even a repo with
just the profiles (without any metadata) would be a big improvement 
over the current situation.


BTW: the openSUSE Conference starts in about a month (June 22-26 in 
Nürnberg [3]), and I'd be happy to meet all of you again there ;-)

I'll give my "AppArmor Crash Course" talk there (probably with a new 
funny[tm] and another, really funny slide).

Holger will also be there and give a talk about reproducible builds. 
Also, someone from openSUSE worked on reproducible builds and will give 
a talk about openSUSE-specific details.


Regards,

Christian Boltz

[1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:cboltz/apparmor-profile-collector
    The resulting RPM is
    http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/cboltz/openSUSE_Factory/noarch/ 
    -> apparmor-profile-collector-*.rpm

[2] "features" mostly means the metadata files we discussed at DebConf 
    with details like package name, version, shipped in complain/enforce/
    inactive mode etc.

[3] https://events.opensuse.org/

-- 
> My personal opinion is that bugzilla should be sent in a rocket
> to the oblivion and pick up something sane and usable, [...]
Do you really mean the core Bugzilla software or perhaps some
infrastructure software like this "Internet in CHAINs" thingy or
whatever its actual name is?
[> Cristian Rodríguez and Johannes Meixner in opensuse-factory]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-apparmor-team/attachments/20160526/73c332f7/attachment.sig>