[pkg-apparmor] [apparmor] RFC: draft proposal for enabling AppArmor by default in Debian

[Tyler Hicks]

On 08/04/2017 06:56 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Michael Biebl:
>> One suggestion: I just tried to run "debcheckout apparmor" which failed
>> because I didn't have bzr installed. I think you'd make apparmor more
>> approachable for other maintainers if the repo was using git.
> 
> Sure (and it would make my life much easier :)
> 
> Both upstream and the Ubuntu packaging are still using bzr, so for now
> stick to Vcs-Bzr for the Debian packaging eases cross-distro
> collaboration. But they/we are in the process of migrating to Git,
> e.g. the apparmor-profiles repo now uses Git. So this will be fixed
> eventually.

Speaking as a member of AppArmor upstream, we haven't had a strong
reason to switch to git but I think it is safe to say that it is
something we'd prioritize higher if we were about to have new people
become active in the project.

Personally, I'd love to see the switch happen soon.

Tyler

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-apparmor-team/attachments/20170804/1d04bd22/attachment-0001.sig>