[pkg-apparmor] Bug#795431: Fix for #795431 v2

[Vincas Dargis]

On 2017.10.10 17:38, intrigeri wrote:
> 1. It seems that your replacement worked fine in most cases (i.e.
>     we now have "$package provides") but in some cases I see "$package
>     package provides", which sounds weird to my ear.

Oh, like the "libapparmor-dev package provides" case? Yes, I haven't thought
about that for some reason.

> 
> 2. Apparently you had missed apparmor-utils.

My bad, sorry.