[pkg-apparmor] Bug#742829: closed by intrigeri <intrigeri at debian.org> (Bug#742829: fixed in apparmor 2.10.95-8)

[Daniel Richard G.]

On Wed, 2017 Sep 27 22:26+0200, Guido Günther wrote:
>
> Great! I'm a big fan of doing things upstream but from my pov I'd
> consider apparmor or chromium to be upstream not Ubuntu. What about
> filing a bug against the Debian chromium package with an updated
> profile as a start? We can then take it from there and file another
> one against apparor once it proves working for more people.

That would amount to the Debian Chromium maintainers becoming the new
upstream for the profile. (Apparmor is basically maintained by
Canonical, so also Ubuntu, and Google pretty surely will never touch
this.) If they're willing, I can hardly see how they could do worse
than Ubuntu.

And if it does work out, then that would be a basis to have Ubuntu ship
the Debian profile instead of its own (neglected) version.

I don't know any of the Debian-Chromium folks to have a sense of what
they're open to; would you?

I'll be happy to provide that updated Chromium profile if you want it.