[pkg-apparmor] Bug#972880: apparmor-easyprof: Consider folding apparmor-easyprof back into apparmor-utils

[intrigeri]

Hi,

intrigeri (2021-02-06):
> intrigeri at debian.org (2020-10-25):
>> it seems to me we could simplify the packaging a bit by merging
>> apparmor-easyprof into apparmor-utils.
>>
>> Looking at the Vcs-Git history, it seems that apparmor-easyprof was
>> initially extracted as a separate package because it was the only
>> consumer of the Python libraries. Now that all apparmor-utils
>> are written in Python, this reason is moot.
>>
>> Jamie, did I miss a good reason to keep it separate?
>
> I intend to give this a try, possibly soonish, in Debian experimental,
> unless I'm told why this would be a bad idea :)

Ping?