[pkg-bacula-devel] FYI: branch stretch-backports not yet tested

[Sven Hartge]

On 14.03.2018 19:20, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:

>> I now did a test-build of the stretch-backports branch and compared the
>> result to the version now in testing (using diffoscope).
>>
>> All file contents and sizes look OK to me, from a meta-data standpoint
>> it seems fine. I will do some test installations later.
> 
> before I do anything stupid, I guess nothing came up and I can do an
> upload?

I have not yet found the time to test the packages, unfortunately.

With the next Semester starting in 2 weeks I have been more than super
busy at work, doing little side projects like this was totally out of
the questions.

And then I managed to destroy my Stretch VM I had at home while at the
same time discovering my backups where no good. Fun times.

From a theoretical standpoint the packages look good. I did a comparison
between the Sid and Stretch-Backports maintainer scripts and this also
looked ok.

But to be really sure, I wanted to do at least a test install and test
upgrade, to check the database upgrade works correct with dbconfig from
Stretch.

S°

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/attachments/20180314/c9f24f27/attachment.sig>