[pkg-bioc] CVS %p
Dirk Eddelbuettel
edd at debian.org
Tue May 22 14:49:32 UTC 2007
(Resending, failed to use group reply at first... --Dirk)
On 22 May 2007 at 16:18, Daniel Bayer wrote:
| Hello Dirk,
|
| Am Dienstag 22 Mai 2007 13:19 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > On 22 May 2007 at 09:27, CVS User db-guest wrote:
| > | Update of /cvsroot/pkg-bioc/papers/nettab2007
| > | In directory alioth:/tmp/cvs-serv30179
| > |
| > | Modified Files:
| > | bioc.pdf bioc.tex
| > | Log Message:
| > | The Conference is on Semantic Web. So we don't have to cite the
| > | wikipedia for RDF. And for ARC we are already citing the paper
| > | [8]
| >
| > Well I can't resist being pedantic here. Having a definition never
| > hurts, and aiming at only a narrow set of specialists may not be
| > good. There may well be people finding / reading the paper who
| > come from 'R at large' who think ARC is a stats program [ if memory
| > serves, there ones was one.
|
| Well, mostly I don't like citing Wikipedia for no good reason. I
"No good reason" ? How about defining a technical term and acronym used in
the paper? I can't think of many better reason.
| assume every interested reader of the article is able to do such a
| search on his own. With the last commit a Abbreviations-Section was
By that logic we should save a tree and delete the reference section too.
| added on the first page. I think this serves the purpose. Are you
| fine with this solution?
Not really, but it's a multi-author paper so I'll be overvoted
D.
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
More information about the pkg-bioc-devel
mailing list