[Pkg-clamav-devel] build clamav with system LLVM

Scott Kitterman debian at kitterman.com
Fri May 2 20:52:39 UTC 2014


On Friday, May 02, 2014 22:19:03 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 02.05.2014 22:09, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, May 02, 2014 20:45:55 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >> On 02.05.2014 19:57, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>> I suspect they would appreciate the patch since using the system LLVM
> >>> (or
> >>> at least updating to a newer one) is definitely in their plans.
> >> 
> >> I hope so. LLVM 2.8 is really a bit outdated (from 2010).
> > 
> > I harassed people on #clamav and got this:
> Thanks.
> 
> > <lattera> I could be wrong... llvm's not my area of expertise
> > <lattera> I asked my coworker, Kevin, to take a look at that bugzilla
> > ticket <lattera> after quick glance, he says he likes the patch overall
> > 
> > That's encouraging, but I'm not entirely comfortable yet (from what I know
> > the patch looks good too).  How about we upload this patch to
> > experimental and then we can see how it works out on multiple
> > architectures?  Once upstream reviews/acks the patch and we see how it
> > works then we can go to unstable.
> An upload to experimental seems like a good idea.
> But keep in mind that experimental defaults to LLVM 3.4, while unstable
> still defaults to LLVM 3.3 (and wheezy to LLVM 3.0).

Build-deps will only get pulled from Experimental if they aren't satisfied from 
Unstable, so we can do it with 3.3 or 3.4 depending on what you want.

Scott K
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20140502/50df5c0f/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list