Bug#209509: marked as done (The package description does not
follow Debian policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:18:15 -0800
Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:02:18 -0500
with message-id <E1D6HJi-0006xn-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#207430: fixed in gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:13:30 +0000
>From jfs@dat.etsit.upm.es Tue Sep 09 15:13:19 2003
Return-path: <jfs@dat.etsit.upm.es>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19worW-0005uh-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:13:19 -0500
Received: (qmail 2769 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:13:18 -0000
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:13:18 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <jfs@computer.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: jfs@computer.org
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <20030909201317.GA2762@dat.etsit.upm.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gnome-icon-theme
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <20030620155309.GA7065@dat.etsit.upm.es>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 207430-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2005 00:08:41 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Mar 01 16:08:41 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6HPt-0003lW-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:08:41 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6HJi-0006xn-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:02:18 -0500
From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
To: 207430-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#207430: fixed in gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-4
Message-Id: <E1D6HJi-0006xn-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:02:18 -0500
Delivered-To: 207430-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: gnome-icon-theme
Source-Version: 2.8.0-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-icon-theme, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnome-icon-theme/gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4.diff.gz
gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnome-icon-theme/gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4.dsc
gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gnome-icon-theme/gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 207430@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> (supplier of updated gnome-icon-theme package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:36:57 +0100
Source: gnome-icon-theme
Binary: gnome-icon-theme
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <kitame@debian.org>
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Description:
gnome-icon-theme - GNOME Desktop icon theme
Closes: 207430 209509 297241
Changes:
gnome-icon-theme (2.8.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Changes by Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>:
+ Fix build-deps, adding libxml-parser-perl (closes: #297241).
* Changes by Josselin Mouette:
+ control.in: include a decent description (closes: #207430, #209509).
Files:
8093586ed83a9a32103dd3505af209ba 1529 gnome optional gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4.dsc
5052edfcf1b64c23ae80cf5918aa26d9 2661 gnome optional gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4.diff.gz
68ba39515cf6a5366aea49ba086b7068 2784716 gnome optional gnome-icon-theme_2.8.0-4_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCJP74rSla4ddfhTMRAo5bAJ0S96h9khVF4yl+QDbMO1mglciDjACfV8xm
4DVnAiK3981YMFs74qiaup4=
=iPOz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----