Bug#941013: libvte-2.91-0: Bug seems to be fixed

[Imi]

Sziasztok!

Attila,... köszi! :) :) látom ott is. Hátha megmozdul valami.

Üdv,
Imi

2024. 01. 20. 13:50 keltezéssel, Hammer Attila írta:
> Jean-philippe, Samuel, possible backporting for bookworm-backports (or 
> the proper stable branch if an user not using stable-backports 
> repository) the 2023. october 23 added patch with Samuel doed?
> Few hungarian users tested the latest Trixie branch available patched 
> libvte2 package version in bookworm, braille-display navigation is 
> works perfect the patched version. :-):-)
> If this is possible (and does not violate the package maintenance 
> policy of the official Debian stable branch), please make this patch 
> available for either the stable-updates or the stable-backports 
> branch, because the accessibility of the graphical Terminal is greatly 
> improved by the patch. For visually impaired users, apart from the 
> console (if they use e.g. Speakup and Espeakup, or Fenrir or 
> Speechd-up screen reader on the console), libvte2-based terminals are 
> the only option to use the command line in the graphical session for 
> barrier-free use for inputting commands (gnome-terminal, 
> mate-terminal, xfce4-terminal, etc.).
> I apologize if I may have written some expressions incorrectly, I am 
> not a Debian package maintainer or a Debian developer, unfortunately I 
> do not have the right rights to upload the backported package, 
> otherwise I would be happy to do this task.
>
> Best regards:
>
> Attila Hammer
>
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:19:55 +0100 Jean-Philippe MENGUAL 
> <jpmengual at debian.org> wrote:
>> Package: libvte-2.91-0
>> Followup-For: Bug #941013
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> For some reason, the bug which existed in the terminal (gnome or 
>> mate) seems
>> to be fixed, as the braille display is now relevant. So at the 
>> moment, the bug
>> is fixed.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where 
>> appropriate ***
>>
>>    * What led up to the situation?
>>    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>>      ineffective)?
>>    * What was the outcome of this action?
>>    * What outcome did you expect instead?
>>
>> *** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
>>
>>
>> -- System Information:
>> Debian Release: trixie/sid
>>   APT prefers buildd-unstable
>>   APT policy: (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
>> 'experimental')
>> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>> Foreign Architectures: i386
>>
>> Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
>> Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
>> Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
>> LANGUAGE not set
>> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
>> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
>>
>> Versions of packages libvte-2.91-0 depends on:
>> ii  libatk1.0-0          2.50.0-1+b1
>> ii  libc6                2.37-13
>> ii  libcairo-gobject2    1.18.0-1+b1
>> ii  libcairo2            1.18.0-1+b1
>> ii  libfribidi0          1.0.13-3+b1
>> ii  libgcc-s1            13.2.0-10
>> ii  libglib2.0-0         2.78.3-1
>> ii  libgnutls30          3.8.3-1
>> ii  libgtk-3-0           3.24.40-1
>> ii  libicu72             72.1-4
>> ii  libpango-1.0-0       1.51.0+ds-4
>> ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.51.0+ds-4
>> ii  libpcre2-8-0         10.42-4
>> ii  libstdc++6           13.2.0-10
>> ii  libsystemd0          255.2-4
>> ii  libvte-2.91-common   0.74.2-1
>> ii  zlib1g               1:1.3.dfsg-3+b1
>>
>> libvte-2.91-0 recommends no packages.
>>
>> libvte-2.91-0 suggests no packages.
>>
>> -- no debconf information
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/attachments/20240120/ff803ae5/attachment.htm>