Bug#312014: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#312014: fop missing dependencies.)

[Jeff Breidenbach]

Look at the package "java-package"

On 6/5/05, Mohammed Sameer <uniball@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 03:03:14PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrot=
e:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > * Mohammed Sameer (uniball@gmx.net) [050604 23:08]:
> > > Package: fop
> > > Severity: grave
> > >
> > >
> > >  apt-get install  fop
> > > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > >
> > > Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely th=
at
> > > the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> > > that package should be filed.
> > > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> >
> > Actually, fop is part of contrib. Packages in contrib and non-free are
> > allowed to depend on certain packages not part of Debian (whereas
> > packages in main are not). For this reason, this is not even a bug.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andi
>=20
> I didn't know this, Sorry it's my fault!
>=20
> Now I'm wondering how can one install such packages ?
>=20
> --
> ----------------
> -- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
> GNU/Linux registered user #224950
> Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
> Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
> --
> Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
> Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
> Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
>=20
>=20
> BodyID:167810195.2.n.logpart (stored separately)
>=20
>