[Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Fri Oct 11 13:25:14 UTC 2013


Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-10-11 14:30:46)
> On 11/10/13 13:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I still (as I believe I pointed out in one of the bugreports I filed 
>> that day when doing the backport) recommend using uglifyjs 
>> consistently.
>>
>> (upstream argued there was a big size gain using another minifier, 
>> but in actual test the difference was minimal, and uglifyjs is (also) 
>> well tested and means simpler dependencies, compared to Java-based 
>> tools.
>>
>
> For some reason (I haven't checked exactly why) upstream uses 
> closure-compiler for their Grammar file and uglify for the rest of 
> their code
>
> While it wouldn't be hard, I'm not too keen to make further changes to 
> their build system unless it is essential - however, if you are 
> curious about this particular case, you could raise an issue in their 
> github project page and we can try to understand it

That's what I did: https://github.com/versatica/JsSIP/issues/158

As I read it, upstream eventually followed mu suggestion to use uglifyjs 
- just haven't materialized as a new upstream version yet, apparently.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20131011/fd5d5ff6/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list