[Pkg-javascript-devel] can we use my fork of node-findit?

Andrew Kelley superjoe30 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 23:03:25 UTC 2014


On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org> wrote:
>
>> Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
>> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
>> > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > What should I do?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
>> > > > > node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary package
>> > > > > node-findit2 (symlinking /usr/lib/nodejs/findit to findit2).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Or the reverse, change upstream and add binary node-findit to
>> > > > > node-findit2.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > What about this?
>> > > >
>> > > > * Add patch as quilt patch to node-findit that is already in debian
>> > > > * When packaging other package updates that depend on findit2,
>> patch them
>> > > > to depend on node-findit instead, since the patch provides the
>> findit2
>> > > API
>> > > > and bug fixes.
>> > >
>> > > I agree up to that point where you imply that findit2 has a different
>> > > API ? If that's the case then findit2 must be... findit2 !
>> > >
>> >
>> > Hmm, in this case, since upstream seems to be ignoring my pull request,
>> > maybe I will
>> >
>> >  * rename the module to a better fork name (as I did with formidable ->
>> > multiparty)
>> >  * add new node module to debian
>> >  * update packages to depend on new module
>> >  * delete node-findit from debian since nothing depends on it
>>
>> If that's the case, then please keep a name close to the original one,
>> so that when packaging a module depending on (old) findit, one can find
>> easily the new findit to be a match.
>>
>> You might also want to commit to keep a backward-compatible API with
>> node-findit.
>>
>> These are only suggestions.
>
>
> I have thought about it, and I decided to keep the name as findit2. Also I
> agree to commit to backward-compatible API with node-findit, so that debian
> packages can use findit2 instead. I should have a package done here
> shortly. One thing that is kind of funny, is that since I cleaned up the
> code considerably, the lines of code is now small enough that FTP masters
> might say it is too small!! But hopefully if we tell them we are going to
> remove node-findit and this package is intended to replace it, then they
> will be OK with it.
>

Alright, node-findit2 is packaged up and ready for review and upload. I
think we should send a note to the FTP masters that it will replace
node-findit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20141017/aa34f010/attachment.html>


More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list