[Pkg-ltsp-devel] Bug#454478: Bug#454478: splitting ltspfsd into two packages

[mariodebian]

El vie, 03-04-2009 a las 23:05 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian escribió:
> i've been looking into splitting ltspfsd into two packages, one with all the
> binaries (ltspfsd-core), and one with all the udev and other scripts(ltspfsd).
> 
> the two binaries are "ltspfsd" and "cdpinger", though both of them call other
> scripts, so those also need be included in the ltspfsd-core package.  so that
> doesn't leave a whole lot of content for the ltspfsd package- just the ldm
> hooks and other generic hooks for X sessions.
> 
> though, with the switch to call cdpinger from udev, splitting the package seems
> more important now.
> 
> ltspfsd-core would be able to no longer recommend ldm (the original reason for
> this bug report), while ltspfsd would continue to do so.
> 
> i've got most of the packaging done... so i guess i'll try and get a sponsor to
> upload it soon.
> 
> live well,
>   vagrant

Very good news, thanks for spliting ltspfsd package.

Can I will install ltspfsd-core (without other depends) in a Desktop
computer?


I'm working on TCOS upload, roadmap here:
http://wiki.tcosproject.org/Tcos_Into_Debian

Last week I have uploaded p910nd to Debian, this package can replace
LTSP python script (jectdirect?? don't remember name) that redirect 9100
port to /dev/lp0:

http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/p910nd


Greetings
-- 
http://soleup.eup.uva.es/mariodebian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada
 digitalmente
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ltsp-devel/attachments/20090404/737fabc6/attachment.pgp