JACK2 package naming convention

[Free Ekanayaka]

Hi Daniel,

|--==> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:59:49 +0100, Daniel James <daniel at 64studio.com> said:

  DJ> Hi Free,
  >>If
  >>we want to start working on jack2, while letting users stick to jack1
  >>till everything is really polished, I suggest uploading jack2 to
  >>experimental.

  DJ> Sounds like a good plan :-) Can I get the JACK 1.9.3 packages
  DJ> sponsored for upload to experimental? Or do they need more work first?

  DJ> http://apt.64studio.com/backports/pool/main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.3-2.dsc
  DJ> http://apt.64studio.com/backports/pool/main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.3-2.tar.gz
  DJ> http://apt.64studio.com/backports/pool/main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.3-2_source.changes

Adrian imported the sources above into the jack-audio-connection-kit git
repository on Alioth and updated it a bit. I've been using it for a
while an I think it's in good shape, I just uploaded it to
experimental. If it turns to be stable for most of us, I'd be happy to
move it to unstable, maybe in a couple of months or so.

Ciao!

Free