Bug#885763: invada-studio-plugins-lv2: Depends on libgnome

Adrian Bunk bunk at debian.org
Sat Jan 27 10:27:27 UTC 2018


On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:21:21AM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2018-01-27 8:48 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk <bunk at debian.org>:
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 08:20:11PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > >...
> > > as you see there is ongoing process of removing of old libs in debian.
> > > ​invada-studio-plugins-lv2 package depends on one of them unfortunately.
> > >...
> >
> > Is there actually any reason why the package does depend on libgnome?
> >
> > No plugin is linked with libgnome (there is also no build dependency),
> > and all these manual library dependencies look wrong to me
> > (${shlibs:Depends} already does the right thing).
> >
> > In other words, I'd suggest to:
> >
> > --- invada-studio-plugins-lv2-1.2.0+repack0/debian/control
> > 2016-12-19 20:44:37.000000000 +0200
> > +++ invada-studio-plugins-lv2-1.2.0+repack0/debian/control
> > 2018-01-27 09:40:48.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -18,12 +18,6 @@
> >  Package: invada-studio-plugins-lv2
> >  Architecture: any
> >  Depends:
> > - libcairo2,
> > - libglade2-0,
> > - libglib2.0-0,
> > - libgnome2-0,
> > - libgtk2.0-0,
> > - libxml2,
> >   ${misc:Depends},
> >   ${shlibs:Depends}
> >  Provides:
> >
> 
> 
> ​Hi Adrian,
> 
> I can definitely do this but package still build-depend on libgtk2.0-dev ...
>...

That's not a problem, at least not for buster.

libgtk2.0-dev will go away at some point, but that will be
much later and definitely not in buster.

> best regards
> 
> mira ​

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list