Bug#1065633: [SPAM] Re: Bug#1065633: openldap: FTBFS on hppa - implicit declaration of function 'kadm5_s_init_with_password_ctx'

John David Anglin dave.anglin at bell.net
Fri Mar 8 02:02:04 GMT 2024


On 2024-03-07 7:21 p.m., Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:29:54PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
>> The binNMUs succeeded on several release arches already. I'm not sure why hppa would be different. I see 
>> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration in its compiler commands, but I don't know where it's coming from.
>
> I remembered later maybe seeing something about this around time64 build flags, and sure enough, in dpkg 1.22.5:
>
> https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=ef90821fe45b99fa8c8c4279b9a74c30f59f491d
>
> So actually it looks like hppa was only the first to encounter it, and armel/armhf are likely to fail the same way (right now they are still 
> BD-Uninstallable), in which case this bug will be RC.
Yes, see:
https://wiki.debian.org/BrainDumpT64

We have been doing a lot of manual builds, so it's possible we may have messed up.

-- 
John David Anglin  dave.anglin at bell.net



More information about the Pkg-openldap-devel mailing list