Bug#828387: libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Petr Pisar ppisar at redhat.com
Mon Nov 28 10:50:08 UTC 2016


On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 04:18:44PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> If we can't get an upstream reaction (which seems probable), maybe
> Petr and Sebastian can at least cross-check their patches and come up
> with a common one?
> 
The Debian patch is more future proof as it assumes the old OpenSSL will
disappear in favor of the new one. I like it. On the other hand it brings many
OpenSSL-licensed code into the patch. That can be unacceptable for someone.

I developed my patch because at that time I did not know about the Debian
patch. There was no upstream bug report linking to it. I'm fine with your
patch. But I even do not maintain the package in Fedora, so I'm not going to
touch the package again unless it breaks.

-- Petr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20161128/fd2dd750/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list