Quick question (was: Re: [Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] ruby-pkg-tools_0.4_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED)

[Esteban Manchado Velázquez]

Hi:

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 11:17:05AM -0800, Debian Installer wrote:
> 
> Accepted:
> ruby-pkg-tools_0.4.dsc
>   to pool/main/r/ruby-pkg-tools/ruby-pkg-tools_0.4.dsc
> ruby-pkg-tools_0.4.tar.gz
>   to pool/main/r/ruby-pkg-tools/ruby-pkg-tools_0.4.tar.gz
> ruby-pkg-tools_0.4_all.deb
>   to pool/main/r/ruby-pkg-tools/ruby-pkg-tools_0.4_all.deb
> Announcing to debian-devel-changes at lists.debian.org

    Who uploaded this package? I've just updated and the changelog still says
"unstable" in the last entry... Shouldn't it say something like "UNRELEASED"?
When compiled with svn-buildpackage --svn-tag, it should add a new (broken)
changelog entry, to avoid mistakes. Aren't we using that, at least for the
"shared" packages?

    Regards,

-- 
Esteban Manchado Velázquez <zoso at debian.org>
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
Help spread it through the Net in signatures, webpages, whatever!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20051219/ff5245b2/attachment.pgp