[DRE-maint] ruby-cairo_1.10.0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Antonio Terceiro]

Vincent Fourmond escreveu isso aí:
> 
>   Hello again,
> 
> On 30/06/11 22:51, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> >Accepted:
> >libcairo-ruby1.8_1.10.0-2_all.deb
> >   to main/r/ruby-cairo/libcairo-ruby1.8_1.10.0-2_all.deb
> >libcairo-ruby_1.10.0-2_all.deb
> >   to main/r/ruby-cairo/libcairo-ruby_1.10.0-2_all.deb
> >ruby-cairo_1.10.0-2.debian.tar.gz
> >   to main/r/ruby-cairo/ruby-cairo_1.10.0-2.debian.tar.gz
> >ruby-cairo_1.10.0-2.dsc
> >   to main/r/ruby-cairo/ruby-cairo_1.10.0-2.dsc
> >ruby-cairo_1.10.0-2_amd64.deb
> >   to main/r/ruby-cairo/ruby-cairo_1.10.0-2_amd64.deb
> 
>   The problem was probably that you're a DM trying to hijack
> libcairo-ruby that is both in ruby-cairo *and* in libruby-cairo, as
> rmadison or dak indicate:
> 
> 
> ~ rmadison libcairo-ruby
>  libcairo-ruby | 1.2.0-1        | etch    | source, all
>  libcairo-ruby | 1.5.1-1+lenny1 | lenny   | source, all
>  libcairo-ruby | 1.8.1-1        | squeeze | source, all
>  libcairo-ruby | 1.8.1-1        | wheezy  | source, all
>  libcairo-ruby | 1.8.1-1        | sid     | source, all
>  libcairo-ruby | 1.10.0-1       | sid     | all
> 
>   (notice the two entries for sid).

Yeah. :-/

>   BTW, I noticed that ruby-cairo FTBS on all arches excepted intel.
> Did you have a look at that ?

No, I didn't notice. 

According to the logs on buildd.d.o, something fails during the
extconf.rb phase. I don't have access to non-intel hardware to test, but
I will install a kfreebsd VM and try since it also fails there.

-- 
Antonio Terceiro <terceiro at softwarelivre.org>
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20110630/239ada95/attachment.pgp>