[DRE-maint] Bug#1036261: ruby-terser: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13: override_dh_install] Error 1

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Source: ruby-terser
Version: 1.1.12+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lucas at debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230517 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> dh_install
> cp /usr/share/nodejs/terser/dist/bundle.min.cjs \
> 	debian/ruby-terser/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/terser-1.1.12/lib/terser.js
> cat debian/patches/terser-sync.patch | \
> 	(cd debian/ruby-terser/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/terser-1.1.12/lib/ && \
> 	patch -p1 && \
> 	rm -f terser.js.orig)
> patching file terser.js
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 21517 (offset 361 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 21525 (offset 361 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 21595 (offset 361 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 29812 (offset 365 lines).
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 29642.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 29659.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 29688.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 30574 (offset 368 lines).
> 3 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file terser.js.rej
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13: override_dh_install] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/05/17/ruby-terser_1.1.12+dfsg-1_testing.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20230517;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20230517&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.