[Pkg-shadow-devel] (forw) Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

[Christian Perrier]

Oh my....


It seems that Tomasz ISP (or TOmasz system itself) began using some
shitty RBLs which probably blacklist entire address blocks, which
include those from Proxad/Free which I use at home.


Please please please, if you have some power to make that stop, please
please tell these people that RBL are pure bloody crappy shit which
most of the time prevent people to send legitimate mails rather than
blocking spam.

Spam control should be done with appropriate software, not by randomly
blocking addresses, which goes againt one of the very first goal of
the Internet=C2=A0: free and easy communication.

Please repeat after me : RBL SUCK AND ARE USELESS. The only blacklists
I personnally approve are blacklists of open relays only such as my
friends from will-spam-for-food.eu.org


In the meantime, I will be force to setup an alternate route for mails
sent to Tomasz domain and that sucks.


And, to answer the question some people may have=C2=A0: no, I don't want =
to
use my ISP SMTP server except when forced to do so=C2=A0: why would I rel=
y
on them while I can rely just on myself to send mails?

I work that way for 15 years now and I see no reason to change
anything, dammit.

/me, angry.

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@kheops.p=
errier.eu.org> -----

Date: Wed,  4 May 2005 22:30:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@kheops.perrier.eu.org>
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: bubulle@kheops.frmug.org

Content-Description: Notification
This is the Postfix program at host kheops.perrier.eu.org.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

			The Postfix program

<kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl>: host boss.zie.pg.gda.pl[153.19.33.230] said: 554
    Service unavailable; [81.56.227.253] blocked using
    blackholes.five-ten-sg.com, reason: miscellaneous address blocks that=
 have
    sent spam here (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Content-Description: Delivery report
Reporting-MTA: dns; kheops.perrier.eu.org
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 274DE4F971
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; bubulle@kheops.frmug.org
Arrival-Date: Wed,  4 May 2005 22:29:31 +0200 (CEST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host boss.zie.pg.gda.pl[153.19.33.230] said: =
554
    Service unavailable; [81.56.227.253] blocked using
    blackholes.five-ten-sg.com, reason: miscellaneous address blocks that=
 have
    sent spam here (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 20:14:00 +0200
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
To: Tomasz K=C5=82oczko <kloczek@zie.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: pkg-shadow-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Debian patch to configure.in

Tomasz, the attached patch is a Debian patch to ./configure.in

Do you have an advice about integrating it upstream=C2=A0?

I indeed have no idea of the real purpose, but you people developers
will certainly know..:-)



--=20




--- shadow-4.0.3.orig/configure.in
+++ shadow-4.0.3/configure.in
@@ -265,9 +265,10 @@
 	AC_CHECK_LIB(pam, pam_start,
 		[AC_DEFINE(USE_PAM)
 		LIBPAM=3D"-lpam"
-		AC_CHECK_LIB(pam_misc, main,
+		AC_CHECK_LIB(pam_misc, misc_conv,
 			[LIBPAM=3D"$LIBPAM -lpam_misc"],
-			AC_MSG_ERROR(libpam_misc is missing)
+			AC_MSG_ERROR(libpam_misc is missing),
+			-lpam
 		)]
 		[AC_MSG_CHECKING(use login access checking if PAM not used)
 		AC_DEFINE(LOGIN_ACCESS)



----- End forwarded message -----

--=20