[arturcz@hell.pl: Re: vim policy]

Stefano Zacchiroli zack@debian.org
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:04:16 +0200


--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 11:44:12PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > All packages that contain vim scripts and adhere to this policy must be=
 named
> > in following pattern:
> >  vim-script-name
> > Currently, only vim-latexsuite conforms to this point.
> There was eons ago when we last discussed vim packaging policy :) I remem=
ber
> some voices saying that it should be vim-packagename-addon to avoid
> confusion with vim compiled with additional script language like: vim-pyt=
hon,
> vim-perl, vim-ruby, etc...

I don't think we will be in trouble for this. The only cause of trouble
will be scripts which provides language specific support, but in my
experience they're named like "vim-*-support" (e.g. vim-perl-support
IIRC).

I would then go for the proposed naming scheme, it is lighter.

Cheers.

--=20
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-

--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCpBGQ1cqbBPLEI7wRAsLvAKCDtdwWcs8NA2sJot15SIHoBAbYGQCfeJwX
D89FRHrzzZBx4yD5hvy1jJQ=
=Iqu0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc--