[vim-tiny] completed (?)

[Norbert Tretkowski]

* Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:46:39PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > I just took a look at it, but I'm a bit confused about the
> > directories and symlinks in /usr/share/doc.
> 
> I completely ignore that issue so if it was broken in the last
> upload it is for sure broken now. We need to decide how to handle
> them. I propose to install all the documentation (including vim-doc
> stuff) in /usr/share/doc/vim-common and have all variants symlink it
> (is it allowed by policy?). I don't know how used to be in the past
> ...

It was handled exactly so in the past, everything was in vim-common
and the other packages just added a link in /usr/share/doc.

> What about vim-runtime?

Maybe we should put stuff into vim-runtime, because vim-tiny coulnd't
symlink to vim-common... vim-runtime is needed for _every_ other vim
package.

> More generally: what about the vim-tiny "philosophy". I mean, Do you
> agree in merging the changes and then continue working on the
> details in the main branch?

Agreed.

Thanks, Norbert