vim-gui-common Arch: all?

James Vega jamessan at jamessan.com
Mon Feb 6 20:00:41 UTC 2006


On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 06:51:21PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Lun 6 Février 2006 18:30, James Vega a écrit :
> > Over the weekend, I changed vim-gui-common to Arch: all since it
> > seems like everything in it is architecture independent.  I realized
> > afterwards that we have a mime file under /usr/lib in vim-gui-common.
> > Is there any reason these need to be under /usr/lib instead of
> > /usr/share?  It seems like they're architecture-indepent to me.
> >
> > James
> 
> it looks like it's not only vim:

Yeah, I noticed other packages also have files there.  That doesn't seem
to agree with the FHS, but lintian doesn't complain.  I guess it's just
accepted since that's been around for a long time.  /usr/share/mime is
based on the newer freedesktop standards.

James
-- 
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan at jamessan.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20060206/9323c94a/attachment.pgp


More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list