"vim" vs "vi"

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

Now, regarding the "intended" part of the commit ...

On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:35:04AM -0000, zack at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> Author: zack
> Date: Sat May 13 02:35:03 2006
> New Revision: 668
> 
> URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/?sc=1&rev=668
> Log:
> differentiated vim default configuration when it is invoked as "vi"

That's it. Invoking 'vim' as 'vi' know source /etc/vim/virc instead of
/etc/vim/vimrc. The former only contains 'set compatible', nothing else.
That was discussed on debian-devel, about the inclusion of vim-tiny in
the base system.

Comments are, of course, welcome.

Besides, could someone please look at my, probably poor, english in
debian/changelog and debian/NEWS (where I also added an entry about
deprecated .local files under /etc/vim/)?

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20060512/bfd44fcb/attachment.pgp