Bug#506190: ftplugin/html.vim: indenting broken

[James McCoy]

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:39:47PM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:56:41AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Look at the attached file. There are three problems/inconsistencies
> > with indenting:
> > 
> > 1. gq causes lines 4-7 to assume the indent of line 3.
> 
> That's not a full command, so I'll assume you meant you were
> reformatting all the text inside the tags (a la gqit).  Reformatting
> simply re-wraps the lines according to the textwidth, causing the new
> line to be indented according to the current indenting rules.  Just like
> manually re-indenting lines 4-7 would use the indent of line 3, so does
> reformatting the text inside the tags.
> 
> > 2. Appending a line after line 3 (o) preserves the indent, as does
> >    autowrapping when adding more text to line 3.
> 
> HTML's indenting is based on the line previous to the line being
> indented.  'indentkeys' is set so that adding a new line (via o or O)
> causes the line to be automatically indented, thus picking up the indent
> of line 3.

The above descriptions are still accurate.

> > 3. Inserting a newline into line 3 removes the indent.
> 
> The html indent script sets 'indentkeys' such that re-indenting is
> performed before the newline is inserted (the *<Return> value in
> 'indentkeys').  Since the line previous to line 3 has zero indent, that
> is how line 3 gets indented.

This doesn't seem to be the case anymore.

It seems like all the behaviors are consistent now.  Do you agree the
bug can be closed?

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20150801/831e2e5f/attachment.sig>