Conflict in vim packaging policy

Reiner Herrmann reiner at reiner-h.de
Sat Feb 4 21:57:07 UTC 2017


Hi,

I was just reading the vim packaging policy [0] and noticed an
inconsistency between the specification of registry files and the
examples at the end.

In 3.3 "name" is mentioned as a required field, while in the examples
there is an "addon" field instead of the "name" field.
It looks like vim addons (and even vim-runtime.yaml) are also using
"addon".
Can you please confirm that "addon" is the field that should be used
and correct the specification accordingly?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
  Reiner

[0]: https://pkg-vim.alioth.debian.org/vim-policy.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20170204/99821dd0/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list