[Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Bug#362026: RM: xen -- obsolete, new splited xen packages upcoming

[Julien Danjou]

On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:00:18PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Erm, why don't you upload with 'xen' instead of 'xen-3.0'? This will
> also make upgrades easier. Since you don't want to support both xen
> versions at the same time, I see no reason for this source and binary
> package rename?

Because we do plan to package and support several major releases of Xen
at the same time.
Furthermore, upgrade from Xen 2 is not possible. This has been discussed
_a lot_ on the Xen Debian mailing list.

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060412/288395ea/attachment.pgp