[Python-modules-team] Bug#577725: python3-docutils

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Jakub Wilk <jwilk at debian.org> [2011.05.28.2013 +0200]:
> docutils-doc:
> - ships documentation
> - recommends "python-docutils | python3-docutils"

Why the recommendation?

> Dear co-maintainers, what do you think? Does it sound sensible?

Yes, it does. Thanks!

> - "python-docutils | python3-docutils" is a bit cumbersome to type,
> maybe both packages could provide a common virtual package (say:
> "docutils")?

Do they have the same "API"? Are they interchangeable?

> - What about existing virtual packages? python-docutils currently
> provides docutils-writer-manpage, docutils-writer-odt,
> python-odtwriter, rst2man, rst2odt. The odt ones are unused, there
> are 3 reverse build-dependencies for man ones. I'm a bit tempted
> to drop all of them entirely.

+1

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1124 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/attachments/20110529/9ad17a0f/attachment.pgp>