[Reproducible-builds] Bug#790103: new default build flag from dpkg: -Wdate-time

Hakan Ardo hakan at debian.org
Wed Nov 18 19:26:24 UTC 2015


Hi,
the archlinux avr-gcc seams to be a standard unpatched gcc compiled for the
avr target. I would prefere to base the main avr-gcc package on the atmel
releases as those have historically been of higiher quality for avr usage.
That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based on gcc
4.9.2 soon. Will that help? Otherwise my suggestion would be that we
introduce a new package, say avr-gcc5, that we base on the gnu release
5.2.0 and keep avr-gcc following the atmel releases.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia at mapreri.org> wrote:

> reassign 790103 gcc-avr 1:4.8.1+Atmel3.4.5-1
> retitle 790103 gcc-avr: base on a newer version of gcc
> affects 790103 expeyes
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> > > > 3- rebase the package gcc-avr on a newer version of gcc, which may
> be a
> > > >    hard work. Such a work seems to exist, for example at
> > > >    https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/avr-gcc/
> since
> > > >    last July
> > >
> > > This is what should be done, really.
> >
> > I had a look at this last option, but I miss knowledge to keep on with
> > it: as I could guess, the current gcc-avr package is based on a frozen
> > archive of gcc-4.8, which is modified by adding subtle modifications.
> > Obviously, I can freeze an archive of gcc-5, but I cannot craft the
> > modifications to turn it into an efficient compiler for avr.
>
> I miss those too, fwiw.
>
> > So I shall reassign bug #790103 to gcc-avr, and keep the suggested link
> > to expeyes.
>
> done.
>
> > As a matter of fact, I cannot push the severity such a bugreport higher
> > than whishlist, as I cannot provide any help about the work to be done.
>
> This is not what is used to decide the severities :), but still it's a
> whishlist bug.
>
> If this is not fixed in time for the change I'll open another bug
> against expeyes to at least disable the flag.
> If for some reason (=> allow us to test your package, maybe?) you want
> to do it now adding this to d/rules should be sufficient
> DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=reproducible=-timeless
>
> > Best regards,                 Georges.
>
> enjoy!
>
> --
> regards,
>                         Mattia Rizzolo
>
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
> more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
>



-- 
Håkan Ardö
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20151118/b076f36f/attachment.html>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list