[Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

Michael R. Crusoe crusoe at ucdavis.edu
Sat Feb 6 09:20:01 UTC 2016


Hello reproducible builds team!

I think you all are the bee's knees. However, some of the packages I
maintain aren't compatible with 32 bit architectures, like armhf, and are
explicitly marked as such. Yet the reproducible builds infrastructure still
tries to build on the incompatible architecture and I get an error on
tracker.d.o and elsewhere.

Here is an example:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/khmer.html

Package: khmer
Architecture: amd64 any-arm64 any-mips64 any-mips64el any-ia64 any-ppc64el
any-sparc64
(from https://sources.debian.net/src/khmer/2.0%2Bdfsg-4/debian/control/ )

Could, perhaps, this not happen?

Thanks in advance,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20160206/46b3a353/attachment.html>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list