misleading timestamps in binnmus

[Johannes Schauer]

Hi,

Quoiting Holger Levsen (2016-11-10 07:48:33)
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:38:45AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > I see. And this changelog.$arch is neither part of the source package,
> > > the .changes file nor the .buildinfo file, it's just included in the
> > > binary packages? Or is it also part of the .changes file?
> > It's in .changes as well. No idea if (any of it) is in .buildinfo
>  
> I certainly hope it's part of the .buildinfo file as well, else, for
> reproducing binNMUs we would also need to store the .changes files in an
> easily accessable manner… (which we plan to do for .buildinfo files, but
> not for .changes files atm…)

for binary-only uploads, dpkg-genbuildinfo will add the Binary-Only-Changes
field to the .buildinfo file which contains the text of the last changelog
entry together with the maintainer name and date.

cheers, josch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20161110/a0d3ef62/attachment.sig>