[sane-devel] Well known option consensus

Étienne Bersac bersace03 at laposte.net
Mon Jan 22 12:44:23 CET 2007


Hi,

> But back to the problem I have/had with Etienne's suggstion for the
> "relations" between page size and scan window coordinates: It does
> not make much sense to allow to set a scan window in overscan mode:
> The backend should calculate the scan window settings automatically
> from the page size, and disable the options tl-x, tl-y, br-x, br-y.

No ! If a user want to scan only a portion of the paper, he must be able
to set scan area, but as long as there is no scan surface, we use paper
size as scan surface. That make sense !

Étienne.
-- 
Verso l'Alto !
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070122/14116d8f/attachment.pgp


More information about the sane-devel mailing list