Tag types - reorganizing all tags - task force

Matthew P. McGuire gray@shadowglade.net
Tue, 6 May 2003 23:57:32 -0400


On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
> "Categories" is bad imho, because it's not intuitive that a package has
> many categories it does fit in.
> 
> Maybe we should really use the term "aspect". or "characteristics"?

I'm not a developer, but 'aspects' sounded nice. I also thought 'traits' 
sounded good as well. However this is still going to be a translation 
nightmare. Especially when people try to translate the actual tags or 
whatever they end up being called. 

Thanks,
-- 
Matthew P. McGuire <gray AT shadowglade.net> 1024D/E21C0E88
CB82 7859 26B2 95E3 1328  5198 D57A D072 E21C 0E88
          When choice matters, choose Debian.