[Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#485233: Bug#485233: Bug#485233: Resolved in git

Luke Faraone luke at laptop.org
Sat Nov 29 00:42:05 UTC 2008

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 19:32, Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org> wrote:

> (*) of course, we could also try to persuade the release team that new
> upstream versions of sugar are desirable for lenny. I'm not sure I agree.
> (And new upstream versions are per default a "no" in a freeze, there are
> exceptions, but..)

As I've said, it's been fixed in those packages, we're just awaiting a
release. Moreover, the fix was made to the older upstream version in git, so
new-upstream-version isn't a problem, we just need a @debian to upload. All
I did was to run a regexp replacing the old path with the new one.

I see no reason why a new package release in lenny should be a problem; this
is a packaging fix that does not modify any sugar code as far as I am aware.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/attachments/20081128/cd5e290c/attachment-0001.htm 

More information about the Debian-olpc-devel mailing list