[xml/sgml] docbook-css packaging question

[W. Borgert]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:22:09PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/holroyd/<package-files>

That sounds OK to me.  I will at least name the directory
consistent with the package name.  It is not very likely, that
other people will ever build another set of useful CSS, but
better stay on the save side.

> How about using "db" instead of "docbook", as in "db-css". Might be more 
> apporpriate. Tough call, really.

As I wrote in the other mail: db sounds like data base :-(

> We're all so damn picky that these simple things become real issues. 
> But, I believe that therein lies one of the strengths of debian: things 
> are done in a consistent, sensible fashion.

Yes, better be picky now and discuss things thrice, as having to
fix packages already installed on millions of machines.  Or
having to live with some sub-optimal settings that have could be
avoided by two emails.

For the package name, I have now decided to call it DeCSS
(Docbook enhanced CSS) :-)  No, better not.

Cheers,
-- 
W. Borgert <debacle at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~debacle/